Hopkinsville mayor breaks tie to pass citywide smoking ban

After a six months of public debate, private wrangling and at least one serious local editorial page flaying, the Hopkinsville City Council narrowly passed a citywide smoking ban Tuesday night. The original ordinance that came before the council at its meeting was more of a smoking regulation than a ban because it required businesses to decide whether they would allow smoking at their establishments, and post that publicly. But once the ordinance came up for discussion, reports Carla Jimenez of the Kentucky New Era, council members opted for an all-or-nothing vote. “If we’re really, truly concerned about the health of people, then it should be everybody,” said Ward 8 Councilwoman Marby Schlegel. The exemptions to a full smoking ban vote were then removed. That vote resulted in a 6-6 tie, which was broken by Mayor Dan Kemp.

“It’s progress,” Kemp told Jimenez after the meeting. He said Hopkinsville now has a smoke-free ordinance similar to Owensboro, Bowling Green, Madisonville, Henderson, Oak Grove and  Paducah. Ward 4 Councilman Ward Henson disagreed.  "I think we took away rights from private business owners, which is something I totally disagree with, but I’m just glad to see the smoking thing out of the way.” The ordinance still has to pass on second reading before it becomes law. (Read more)

The excoriating editorial (see above) can be read here.

After a six months of public debate, private wrangling and at least one serious local editorial page flaying, the Hopkinsville City Council narrowly passed a citywide smoking ban Tuesday night. The original ordinance that came before the council at its meeting was more of a smoking regulation than a ban because it required businesses to decide whether they would allow smoking at their establishments, and post that publicly. But once the ordinance came up for discussion, reports Carla Jimenez of the Kentucky New Era, council members opted for an all-or-nothing vote. “If we’re really, truly concerned about the health of people, then it should be everybody,” said Ward 8 Councilwoman Marby Schlegel. The exemptions to a full smoking ban vote were then removed. That vote resulted in a 6-6 tie, which was broken by Mayor Dan Kemp.

“It’s progress,” Kemp told Jimenez after the meeting. He said Hopkinsville now has a smoke-free ordinance similar to Owensboro, Bowling Green, Madisonville, Henderson, Oak Grove and  Paducah. Ward 4 Councilman Ward Henson disagreed.  "I think we took away rights from private business owners, which is something I totally disagree with, but I’m just glad to see the smoking thing out of the way.” The ordinance still has to pass on second reading before it becomes law. (Read more)

The excoriating editorial (see above) can be read here.

Read More

Intestinal pathogens in shelter cats

Sabshin SJ, Levy JK, Tupler T, Tucker SJ, Greiner EC and Leutenegger CM. Enteropathogens identified in cats entering a Florida animal shelter with normal feces or diarrhea. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012; 241: 331-7.
 
Some pathogens of the intestines of cats are transmissible to people. Some pathogens may be more common in shelter-housed cats than pet cats likely due to lack of preventive health care. Often times infected cats are completely asymptomatic. These investigators examined the feces of cats entering a shelter for various enteric pathogens. They tested 100 cats from a municipal shelter, 50 with diarrhea and 50 without, for a variety of enteric pathogens. Twelve different agents were identified. Interestingly, cats with diarrhea were no more likely to be infected with more than one pathogen than cats without any symptoms. Only feline coronavirus was more likely to be found in cats with diarrhea than cats with normal stools. 

Among the 12 agents identified in the cats tested, several were zoonotic agents, transmissible to people. These included various parasites as well as Salmonella. It is not possible to test all shelter cats for these pathogens, thus it is imperative that appropriate management and biosecurity measures be used by personnel at shelters for their protection. [MK]

See also: Queen EV, Marks SL and Farver TB. Prevalence of selected bacterial and parasitic agents in feces from diarrheic and healthy control Cats from Northern California. J Vet Intern Med. 2012; 26: 54-60.

More on cat health:
Winn Feline Foundation Library
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Join us on Google+

Sabshin SJ, Levy JK, Tupler T, Tucker SJ, Greiner EC and Leutenegger CM. Enteropathogens identified in cats entering a Florida animal shelter with normal feces or diarrhea. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012; 241: 331-7.
 
Some pathogens of the intestines of cats are transmissible to people. Some pathogens may be more common in shelter-housed cats than pet cats likely due to lack of preventive health care. Often times infected cats are completely asymptomatic. These investigators examined the feces of cats entering a shelter for various enteric pathogens. They tested 100 cats from a municipal shelter, 50 with diarrhea and 50 without, for a variety of enteric pathogens. Twelve different agents were identified. Interestingly, cats with diarrhea were no more likely to be infected with more than one pathogen than cats without any symptoms. Only feline coronavirus was more likely to be found in cats with diarrhea than cats with normal stools. 

Among the 12 agents identified in the cats tested, several were zoonotic agents, transmissible to people. These included various parasites as well as Salmonella. It is not possible to test all shelter cats for these pathogens, thus it is imperative that appropriate management and biosecurity measures be used by personnel at shelters for their protection. [MK]

See also: Queen EV, Marks SL and Farver TB. Prevalence of selected bacterial and parasitic agents in feces from diarrheic and healthy control Cats from Northern California. J Vet Intern Med. 2012; 26: 54-60.

More on cat health:
Winn Feline Foundation Library
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Join us on Google+

Read More

Study: Small business owners see bottom-line benefit from employee health and wellness programs

A study of small businesses has found that three out of four offering health and wellness programs to their employees believe the initiatives are good for their bottom line. The study, conducted by the National Small Business Association and Humana Inc., asked more than 1,000 small-business owners about their employees' health and wellness needs and what barriers they face in supplying them.  An overwhelming 93 percent said they considered their employees’ physical and mental health to be important to their financial results.

However, only one-third expressed confidence in their ability to help employees manage their well-being with initiatives aimed at encouraging them to make healthier choices such as getting preventative care, eating right and exercising.

Another key finding was that more than half of the small-business owners reported that they did not have sufficient information to introduce health and wellness programs to their employees. On the other hand, startups -- those companies less than 10 years old -- found ways to do so, with 63 percent having already adopted health and wellness programs.

“Wellness solutions likely will be an increasingly important part of the employee value proposition,” said Jerry Ganoni, President of Humana’s Small Business Division. “It will be crucial for the industry to focus on providing small-business owners with the information they need to make the wellness decisions necessary to recruit and retain employees while making an a meaningful impact on their bottom lines.”  (Read more, from The Lane Report)

A study of small businesses has found that three out of four offering health and wellness programs to their employees believe the initiatives are good for their bottom line. The study, conducted by the National Small Business Association and Humana Inc., asked more than 1,000 small-business owners about their employees' health and wellness needs and what barriers they face in supplying them.  An overwhelming 93 percent said they considered their employees’ physical and mental health to be important to their financial results.

However, only one-third expressed confidence in their ability to help employees manage their well-being with initiatives aimed at encouraging them to make healthier choices such as getting preventative care, eating right and exercising.

Another key finding was that more than half of the small-business owners reported that they did not have sufficient information to introduce health and wellness programs to their employees. On the other hand, startups -- those companies less than 10 years old -- found ways to do so, with 63 percent having already adopted health and wellness programs.

“Wellness solutions likely will be an increasingly important part of the employee value proposition,” said Jerry Ganoni, President of Humana’s Small Business Division. “It will be crucial for the industry to focus on providing small-business owners with the information they need to make the wellness decisions necessary to recruit and retain employees while making an a meaningful impact on their bottom lines.”  (Read more, from The Lane Report)

Read More

Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky looking for grant applications for programs that cut chronic disease risk for school-age kids

The Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky is looking for applications for grants that will fund innovative programs to reduce chronic disease risk for school-aged children. Because chronic disease occurs at higher rates in Kentucky than in surrounding areas, the foundation sees this new "Investing in Kentucky’s Future" initiative is seen as having particular urgency. It anticipates awarding grants to five to 10 communities statewide.

This five-year, $3 million program seeks to find ways to limit those diseases that decrease quality of life and increase the risk of early death. These include conditions like cancer, diabetes, heart disease, even substance abuse and some mental illness.

Susan Zepeda, CEO of the foundation, explains that the organization's "goal is to help communities make positive changes that will help children start and sustain healthy habits to last a lifetime. Whether the challenge is access to needed routine medical check-ups, safe places to play or nutritious foods, or caring adults to show ways to communicate and avoid risky behaviors, we want to help communities find new pathways to positive solutions.”

The deadline to submit a letter of intent to apply for grant funding is Nov. 16. Following a letter of intent, the foundation will invite applicants to submit a full proposal. The deadline for the receipt of the full proposal is Feb. 28, 2013. For a complete copy of the Request For Proposal, and additional information regarding grant opportunities through the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, visit www.healthy-ky.org or call (toll-free) 877-326-2583.

The Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky is looking for applications for grants that will fund innovative programs to reduce chronic disease risk for school-aged children. Because chronic disease occurs at higher rates in Kentucky than in surrounding areas, the foundation sees this new "Investing in Kentucky’s Future" initiative is seen as having particular urgency. It anticipates awarding grants to five to 10 communities statewide.

This five-year, $3 million program seeks to find ways to limit those diseases that decrease quality of life and increase the risk of early death. These include conditions like cancer, diabetes, heart disease, even substance abuse and some mental illness.

Susan Zepeda, CEO of the foundation, explains that the organization's "goal is to help communities make positive changes that will help children start and sustain healthy habits to last a lifetime. Whether the challenge is access to needed routine medical check-ups, safe places to play or nutritious foods, or caring adults to show ways to communicate and avoid risky behaviors, we want to help communities find new pathways to positive solutions.”

The deadline to submit a letter of intent to apply for grant funding is Nov. 16. Following a letter of intent, the foundation will invite applicants to submit a full proposal. The deadline for the receipt of the full proposal is Feb. 28, 2013. For a complete copy of the Request For Proposal, and additional information regarding grant opportunities through the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, visit www.healthy-ky.org or call (toll-free) 877-326-2583.

Read More

Do Kentucky families care about obesity? Louisville newspaper blog says yes; now comes the hard part

In The Prime, The Courier-Journal's collection of news, features, videos and blogs "that help you thrive as you age" has taken on a new crusade: obesity. It's a brave initiative in the blog's ongoing effort to get families on board with better health, better eating and longer lives. The blog started with a simple question: Do Kentucky families care about this issue? The answer is a resounding yes. Sharon Cecil, writing for the nutritional, medical, spiritual and fitness advisers on the blog board, explains that the group has done a year's worth of work and has now scheduled focus groups for more specifics. Stay tuned here.

Louisville cardiologist John Mandrola, meanwhile, takes on sugary drinks in the Sept. 22 blog installment of In the Prime. He astonishes with the simple fact that the average male teen drinks 357 calories daily from sugar-sweetened beverages. Not a useful nutrient in sight. And, he adds, if that male is pre-determined genetically to be obese, a Harvard study just found that could be even more susceptible to the harmful effects of sugar-sweetened beverages. The bad news only gets worse. (Associated Press photo)

Lastly, Cecil, a nurse, has high marks for the HBO series, "The Weight of the Nation: Confronting America's Obesity Epidemic." Go here to see all parts of that series.

In The Prime, The Courier-Journal's collection of news, features, videos and blogs "that help you thrive as you age" has taken on a new crusade: obesity. It's a brave initiative in the blog's ongoing effort to get families on board with better health, better eating and longer lives. The blog started with a simple question: Do Kentucky families care about this issue? The answer is a resounding yes. Sharon Cecil, writing for the nutritional, medical, spiritual and fitness advisers on the blog board, explains that the group has done a year's worth of work and has now scheduled focus groups for more specifics. Stay tuned here.

Louisville cardiologist John Mandrola, meanwhile, takes on sugary drinks in the Sept. 22 blog installment of In the Prime. He astonishes with the simple fact that the average male teen drinks 357 calories daily from sugar-sweetened beverages. Not a useful nutrient in sight. And, he adds, if that male is pre-determined genetically to be obese, a Harvard study just found that could be even more susceptible to the harmful effects of sugar-sweetened beverages. The bad news only gets worse. (Associated Press photo)

Lastly, Cecil, a nurse, has high marks for the HBO series, "The Weight of the Nation: Confronting America's Obesity Epidemic." Go here to see all parts of that series.

Read More

Obesity is a dirty word: Study looks at what works in anti-obesity campaigns, and it's not telling people they're fat

What about those anti-obesity ads? Is anyone listening? If so, is anyone motivated to do better? Might they be offensive to some? Educational? Helpful? Are they working at all? More importantly, why and why not?

Researchers at Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity have stepped into the breach to measure Americans' attitudes about ads meant to encourage less girth and better nutrition. According to The Atlantic's Lindsay Abrams, the researchers took a nationally representative sample of Americans and asked them to look hard at these highly visible campaigns and their somewhat showy slogans. Abrams writes: "The researchers were interested in knowing what the respondents thought about how informative, motivating, or credible the slogans seemed. They were also curious as to which ads came off as confusing, stigmatizing, or inappropriate. Finally, they asked the respondents whether they intended to follow the messages' advice."

The result? Not surprising, really. We want positive reinforcement and reject stigmatizing or otherwise negative messages. Our favorite message of the ones examined? The simple one from First Lady Michelle Obama's "Let's Move" campaign, "Move Every Day."  The most positively rated campaigns? "Those focused on encouraging specific health behaviors or actions, like eating fruits and vegetables every day or engaging in physical activity," said the study's lead author Rebecca Puhl, "And the most motivating were the ones that made no mention of obesity or weight at all."

Nobody, researchers found, likes being told that their child's obesity is their fault or that it is child abuse. Neither do we like being told we're fat but not told clearly what to do about it. 'Obesity' itself is a bad word. "Certainly what we find is when more neutral words are used, like 'unhealthy weight' or 'high BMI' those are preferred and viewed to be more motivating," said Puhl. The trick, Abrams writes, is going to be in "figuring out how to be anti-obesity without being anti-obese people" -- and boiling these issues down to a slogan is difficult to do. (Read more)

You might also be interested in a related Atlantic story about how a Minnesota "anti-obesity" campaign lies in that gray area between educating and shaming. To read the story and view the videos of the ads, go here.

What about those anti-obesity ads? Is anyone listening? If so, is anyone motivated to do better? Might they be offensive to some? Educational? Helpful? Are they working at all? More importantly, why and why not?

Researchers at Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity have stepped into the breach to measure Americans' attitudes about ads meant to encourage less girth and better nutrition. According to The Atlantic's Lindsay Abrams, the researchers took a nationally representative sample of Americans and asked them to look hard at these highly visible campaigns and their somewhat showy slogans. Abrams writes: "The researchers were interested in knowing what the respondents thought about how informative, motivating, or credible the slogans seemed. They were also curious as to which ads came off as confusing, stigmatizing, or inappropriate. Finally, they asked the respondents whether they intended to follow the messages' advice."

The result? Not surprising, really. We want positive reinforcement and reject stigmatizing or otherwise negative messages. Our favorite message of the ones examined? The simple one from First Lady Michelle Obama's "Let's Move" campaign, "Move Every Day."  The most positively rated campaigns? "Those focused on encouraging specific health behaviors or actions, like eating fruits and vegetables every day or engaging in physical activity," said the study's lead author Rebecca Puhl, "And the most motivating were the ones that made no mention of obesity or weight at all."

Nobody, researchers found, likes being told that their child's obesity is their fault or that it is child abuse. Neither do we like being told we're fat but not told clearly what to do about it. 'Obesity' itself is a bad word. "Certainly what we find is when more neutral words are used, like 'unhealthy weight' or 'high BMI' those are preferred and viewed to be more motivating," said Puhl. The trick, Abrams writes, is going to be in "figuring out how to be anti-obesity without being anti-obese people" -- and boiling these issues down to a slogan is difficult to do. (Read more)

You might also be interested in a related Atlantic story about how a Minnesota "anti-obesity" campaign lies in that gray area between educating and shaming. To read the story and view the videos of the ads, go here.

Read More

UK researcher part of team that has identified Usher Syndrome gene, responsible for genetic loss of sight and hearing in babies

A University of Kentucky physiologist has teamed with researchers from several institutions to report a novel type of gene associated with Usher Syndrome, a hereditary disease that causes individuals to lose both hearing and sight. The work of Gregory Frolenkov, associate professor at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine, and others led by Zubair M. Ahmed from the University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, is being published in the November 2012 issue of Nature Genetics.

 In the United States, approximately six of every 100,000 babies have Usher Syndrome. About 3 to 6 percent of all children who are deaf and another 3 to 6 percent of children who are hard of hearing have Usher Syndrome. According to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, parents who have normal hearing and vision usually do not know if they are carriers of an Usher gene mutation. It is not yet possible to determine whether a person who does not have a family history of Usher syndrome is a carrier. Several genes associated with different types of Usher Syndrome have been identified.

A University of Kentucky physiologist has teamed with researchers from several institutions to report a novel type of gene associated with Usher Syndrome, a hereditary disease that causes individuals to lose both hearing and sight. The work of Gregory Frolenkov, associate professor at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine, and others led by Zubair M. Ahmed from the University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, is being published in the November 2012 issue of Nature Genetics.

 In the United States, approximately six of every 100,000 babies have Usher Syndrome. About 3 to 6 percent of all children who are deaf and another 3 to 6 percent of children who are hard of hearing have Usher Syndrome. According to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, parents who have normal hearing and vision usually do not know if they are carriers of an Usher gene mutation. It is not yet possible to determine whether a person who does not have a family history of Usher syndrome is a carrier. Several genes associated with different types of Usher Syndrome have been identified.

Read More