Pages

Showing posts with label vaccine-associated sarcoma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccine-associated sarcoma. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Feline postvaccinal sarcomas: a 20-year history

Wilcock B, Wilcock A and Bottoms K. Feline postvaccinal sarcoma: 20 years later. Can Vet J. 2012; 53: 430-4. 

After vaccine-associated sarcomas were first identified in 1991, a large amount of information from histological assessment of these sarcomas along with a wealth of clinical and epidemiological studies culminated in a consensus about many aspects of this disease. This consensus lead to recommendations for profound changes in feline vaccination protocols in the 2 years following the formation of the Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force in 1996. For example, the recommendations called for more selective use of leukemia vaccination, less frequent vaccination for rabies, and vaccination at distal limb sites that are more amenable to amputation. In addition, it was hoped that introduction of virus-vectored, non-adjuvanted leukemia and rabies vaccines that cause little or no inflammation would further contribute to a gradual decline in disease prevalence. Little long-term evaluation of disease prevalence has been published after recommended changes in feline vaccination protocols.

The authors in this report present prevalence data based on 1,401 feline postvaccinal sarcoma biopsy samples diagnosed out of 11,609 feline skin masses submitted at a single histopathology laboratory (Histovet Surgical Pathology, Guelph, Ontario, Canada) for the 19 year interval from 1992 to 2010. Their results indicate no statistically meaningful change in overall disease prevalence over the past 19 years. In particular, there has been no apparent decrease in overall prevalence in response to vaccination protocol changes initiated in 1996, or in response to introduction of non-adjuvanted rabies vaccine in the year 2000. The authors speculate that failure to detect any meaningful change in disease prevalence is likely due to there not being a significant shift in use from traditional adjuvanted vaccines to the newer virus-vectored non-adjuvanted vaccines. The major barrier for not using the newer vaccines is thought to be their higher cost and annual re-vaccination licensing instead of every 3 or 4 years. [GO]

See also: McLeland SM, Imhoff DJ, Thomas M, Powers BE and Quimby JM. Subcutaneous fluid port-associated soft tissue sarcoma in a cat. J Feline Med Surg. 2013.

Related blog posts:
Injection-site sarcomas in cats (Oct. 2012)
Fibrosarcoma from a retained surgical sponge in a cat (Aug. 2010) 

More on cat health:
Winn Feline Foundation Library
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Join us on Google+

Wilcock B, Wilcock A and Bottoms K. Feline postvaccinal sarcoma: 20 years later. Can Vet J. 2012; 53: 430-4. 

After vaccine-associated sarcomas were first identified in 1991, a large amount of information from histological assessment of these sarcomas along with a wealth of clinical and epidemiological studies culminated in a consensus about many aspects of this disease. This consensus lead to recommendations for profound changes in feline vaccination protocols in the 2 years following the formation of the Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force in 1996. For example, the recommendations called for more selective use of leukemia vaccination, less frequent vaccination for rabies, and vaccination at distal limb sites that are more amenable to amputation. In addition, it was hoped that introduction of virus-vectored, non-adjuvanted leukemia and rabies vaccines that cause little or no inflammation would further contribute to a gradual decline in disease prevalence. Little long-term evaluation of disease prevalence has been published after recommended changes in feline vaccination protocols.

The authors in this report present prevalence data based on 1,401 feline postvaccinal sarcoma biopsy samples diagnosed out of 11,609 feline skin masses submitted at a single histopathology laboratory (Histovet Surgical Pathology, Guelph, Ontario, Canada) for the 19 year interval from 1992 to 2010. Their results indicate no statistically meaningful change in overall disease prevalence over the past 19 years. In particular, there has been no apparent decrease in overall prevalence in response to vaccination protocol changes initiated in 1996, or in response to introduction of non-adjuvanted rabies vaccine in the year 2000. The authors speculate that failure to detect any meaningful change in disease prevalence is likely due to there not being a significant shift in use from traditional adjuvanted vaccines to the newer virus-vectored non-adjuvanted vaccines. The major barrier for not using the newer vaccines is thought to be their higher cost and annual re-vaccination licensing instead of every 3 or 4 years. [GO]

See also: McLeland SM, Imhoff DJ, Thomas M, Powers BE and Quimby JM. Subcutaneous fluid port-associated soft tissue sarcoma in a cat. J Feline Med Surg. 2013.

Related blog posts:
Injection-site sarcomas in cats (Oct. 2012)
Fibrosarcoma from a retained surgical sponge in a cat (Aug. 2010) 

More on cat health:
Winn Feline Foundation Library
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Join us on Google+

Read More


Monday, June 1, 2009

Feline Vaccine-Associated Sarcoma Treatment

Eckstein, C., F. Guscetti, et al. (2009). "A retrospective analysis of radiation therapy for the treatment of feline vaccine-associated sarcoma." Vet Comp Oncol 7(1): 54-68.

Feline vaccine-associated sarcomas occur in about 1 in 10,000 vaccinated cats, comprise about 40% of all skin tumors, and are the most frequent skin tumor in cats. These tumors are highly invasive and rapidly growing. This study, among other goals, examined the effect of curative radiation treatment on survival time after surgery. Curative treatment (higher dosages, more frequent administration) did improve outcome. Cats with a poorer prognosis and given reduced radiation therapy benefited from the addition of chemotherapy by increased survival time. Both protocols are legitimate options for vaccine-associated sarcomas. [MK]
>> PubMed Abstract

Related articles:
Kass, P. H., W. L. Spangler, et al. (2003). "Multicenter case-control study of risk factors associated with development of vaccine-associated sarcomas in cats." J Am Vet Med Assoc 223(9): 1283-92.
>> PubMed Abstract

Romanelli, G., L. Marconato, et al. (2008). "Analysis of prognostic factors associated with injection-site sarcomas in cats: 57 cases (2001-2007)." J Am Vet Med Assoc 232(8): 1193-9.
>> PubMed Abstract

More on cat health: Winn Feline Foundation Library
Join us on Facebook
Eckstein, C., F. Guscetti, et al. (2009). "A retrospective analysis of radiation therapy for the treatment of feline vaccine-associated sarcoma." Vet Comp Oncol 7(1): 54-68.

Feline vaccine-associated sarcomas occur in about 1 in 10,000 vaccinated cats, comprise about 40% of all skin tumors, and are the most frequent skin tumor in cats. These tumors are highly invasive and rapidly growing. This study, among other goals, examined the effect of curative radiation treatment on survival time after surgery. Curative treatment (higher dosages, more frequent administration) did improve outcome. Cats with a poorer prognosis and given reduced radiation therapy benefited from the addition of chemotherapy by increased survival time. Both protocols are legitimate options for vaccine-associated sarcomas. [MK]
>> PubMed Abstract

Related articles:
Kass, P. H., W. L. Spangler, et al. (2003). "Multicenter case-control study of risk factors associated with development of vaccine-associated sarcomas in cats." J Am Vet Med Assoc 223(9): 1283-92.
>> PubMed Abstract

Romanelli, G., L. Marconato, et al. (2008). "Analysis of prognostic factors associated with injection-site sarcomas in cats: 57 cases (2001-2007)." J Am Vet Med Assoc 232(8): 1193-9.
>> PubMed Abstract

More on cat health: Winn Feline Foundation Library
Join us on Facebook
Read More