Pages

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Beshear issues order to create insurance exchange as GOP legislators carry symbolic vote against lease to house it

As Gov. Steve Beshear issued an executive order to establish a state insurance exchange this afternoon, lawmakers voted along party lines against a lease that would have housed employees of the exchange, once again illustrating the divisive nature of the controversial Affordable Care Act.

Members of the Capital Projects and Bond Oversight Committee voted 4-3 against the nearly $300,00-per-year lease, with Sen. Tom Buford of Nicholasville, Sen. Jared Carpenter of Berea, Rep. Steven Rudy of Paducah— all Republicans — voting no, along with Independent Sen. Bob Leeper of Paducah. Leeper caucuses with Senate Republicans.

Rep. Jim Wayne, Sen. Julian Carroll of Frankfort and and Rep. Jim Glenn of Owensboro, all Democrats, voted yes. Discussion focused on the uncertainty of the cost of implementing provisions in the Affordable Care Act and the state budget.

The committee does not have the power to block the lease permanently, but Beshear will have to go through some additional procedural steps.

The exchange is considered one of the cornerstones of the federal health-care reform law aimed at containing costs by spurring competition among private insurers. It will be a marketplace to shop for different packages of state-approved health insurance and will be available to people who earn up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level. To offset the cost of their premiums, those participating in the exchange will receive subsidies in the form of tax credits. The Medicaid program will also fall under the exchange's umbrella. 

Small businesses with fewer than 100 employees can also qualify for the exchange, a move that is meant to boost their purchasing power.
 
Beshear said, "We will work closely with insurers, providers and consumers and other groups to develop a robust, responsive, and user-friendly portal that will help Kentuckians find the coverage that best suits their needs."

He said the exchange will be in operation starting Jan. 1, 2014 as the federal law requires. The state has already received more than $66 million to plan for the exchange. States had the option to run the exchange themselves or have the federal government do so for them. But Audrey Tayse Haynes, secretary for the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, said Kentucky is better geared to running its own program since it "is more in tune with the unique regional and economic needs of our citizens, as well as the health insurance needs of individuals, Kentucky small businesses and nonprofits." (Read more)
As Gov. Steve Beshear issued an executive order to establish a state insurance exchange this afternoon, lawmakers voted along party lines against a lease that would have housed employees of the exchange, once again illustrating the divisive nature of the controversial Affordable Care Act.

Members of the Capital Projects and Bond Oversight Committee voted 4-3 against the nearly $300,00-per-year lease, with Sen. Tom Buford of Nicholasville, Sen. Jared Carpenter of Berea, Rep. Steven Rudy of Paducah— all Republicans — voting no, along with Independent Sen. Bob Leeper of Paducah. Leeper caucuses with Senate Republicans.

Rep. Jim Wayne, Sen. Julian Carroll of Frankfort and and Rep. Jim Glenn of Owensboro, all Democrats, voted yes. Discussion focused on the uncertainty of the cost of implementing provisions in the Affordable Care Act and the state budget.

The committee does not have the power to block the lease permanently, but Beshear will have to go through some additional procedural steps.

The exchange is considered one of the cornerstones of the federal health-care reform law aimed at containing costs by spurring competition among private insurers. It will be a marketplace to shop for different packages of state-approved health insurance and will be available to people who earn up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level. To offset the cost of their premiums, those participating in the exchange will receive subsidies in the form of tax credits. The Medicaid program will also fall under the exchange's umbrella. 

Small businesses with fewer than 100 employees can also qualify for the exchange, a move that is meant to boost their purchasing power.
 
Beshear said, "We will work closely with insurers, providers and consumers and other groups to develop a robust, responsive, and user-friendly portal that will help Kentuckians find the coverage that best suits their needs."

He said the exchange will be in operation starting Jan. 1, 2014 as the federal law requires. The state has already received more than $66 million to plan for the exchange. States had the option to run the exchange themselves or have the federal government do so for them. But Audrey Tayse Haynes, secretary for the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, said Kentucky is better geared to running its own program since it "is more in tune with the unique regional and economic needs of our citizens, as well as the health insurance needs of individuals, Kentucky small businesses and nonprofits." (Read more)
Read More


Beshear to have outside panel review cases of children killed or life-threatened by abuse

An independent panel of experts will review cases of children who have been killed or severely hurt by child abuse or neglect, Gov. Steve Beshear announced Monday. The panel will have 17 members and be based in the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet. Its aim will be to assess if the state's child-protection workers did all they could to protect children who died as a result of abuse. It will also determine causes of death.

The Cabinet for Health and Family Services "released thousands of pages of documents Monday that detail the state's involvement with dozens of children who were killed or nearly killed as a result of abuse of neglect," reports Beth Musgrave for the Lexington Herald-Leader. "Still, the cabinet continues to withhold some case files and has redacted large portions of others."

The release is the result of a lengthy court battle between the cabinet and the state's two largest newspapers, the Herald-Leader and The Courier-Journal. The newspapers argued documents pertaining to these cases were subject to open record laws and Franklin Circuit Court Judge Phillip Shepherd agreed. The cabinet released 76 of about 140 files, but with key information omitted. In February, Shepherd ruled the cabinet had 90 days to hand over remaining case files, fined the cabinet $16,000 for withholding the records and ordered it to pay $57,000 in attorney fees for the newspapers.

The cabinet appealed the ruling in the Court of Appeals, but on July 9, the court sided with the newspapers, refusing to allow the documents from being withheld. More than 40 similarily-redacted cases were released yesterday but the cabinet filed an appeal with the Kentucky Supreme Court. "We disagree on how much personal information about the children and private individuals included in caseworker files should be made public," Cabinet Secretary Audrey Haynes said.

Also yesterday, Beshear issued an order to create the panel, which will meet four times a year and will issue an annual report that details issues it finds. "When a child dies or is critically injured because of abuse or neglect, we must carefully review the practices of all government entitites involved to make sure that our system performed as it was supposed to — and if not, that review allows us to take disciplinary action," Beshear said.

Panel members will include law enforcement, prosecutors and medical experts, Musgrave reports. While the meetings will be open to the public, the records consulted during them will not be subject to open records laws. (Read more)
An independent panel of experts will review cases of children who have been killed or severely hurt by child abuse or neglect, Gov. Steve Beshear announced Monday. The panel will have 17 members and be based in the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet. Its aim will be to assess if the state's child-protection workers did all they could to protect children who died as a result of abuse. It will also determine causes of death.

The Cabinet for Health and Family Services "released thousands of pages of documents Monday that detail the state's involvement with dozens of children who were killed or nearly killed as a result of abuse of neglect," reports Beth Musgrave for the Lexington Herald-Leader. "Still, the cabinet continues to withhold some case files and has redacted large portions of others."

The release is the result of a lengthy court battle between the cabinet and the state's two largest newspapers, the Herald-Leader and The Courier-Journal. The newspapers argued documents pertaining to these cases were subject to open record laws and Franklin Circuit Court Judge Phillip Shepherd agreed. The cabinet released 76 of about 140 files, but with key information omitted. In February, Shepherd ruled the cabinet had 90 days to hand over remaining case files, fined the cabinet $16,000 for withholding the records and ordered it to pay $57,000 in attorney fees for the newspapers.

The cabinet appealed the ruling in the Court of Appeals, but on July 9, the court sided with the newspapers, refusing to allow the documents from being withheld. More than 40 similarily-redacted cases were released yesterday but the cabinet filed an appeal with the Kentucky Supreme Court. "We disagree on how much personal information about the children and private individuals included in caseworker files should be made public," Cabinet Secretary Audrey Haynes said.

Also yesterday, Beshear issued an order to create the panel, which will meet four times a year and will issue an annual report that details issues it finds. "When a child dies or is critically injured because of abuse or neglect, we must carefully review the practices of all government entitites involved to make sure that our system performed as it was supposed to — and if not, that review allows us to take disciplinary action," Beshear said.

Panel members will include law enforcement, prosecutors and medical experts, Musgrave reports. While the meetings will be open to the public, the records consulted during them will not be subject to open records laws. (Read more)
Read More


Cats and canine parvovirus

Clegg SR, Coyne KP, Dawson S, et al. Canine parvovirus in asymptomatic feline carriers. Vet Microbiol 2012;157:78-85.
 
Parvoviruses are important pathogens of dogs and cats, and have a high mutation rate. The canine strains that have emerged in recent years have the ability to infect and cause disease in cats as well as dogs. These investigators looked at the numbers of healthy cats in rescue shelters that harbor canine parvovirus in their feces. In fact, CPV was found in one-third of cats in a cat-only rescue shelter and a mixed rescue shelter. Interestingly, no feline parvovirus was found in these cats. Also interesting was the fact that none of the cats were clinically ill. This indicates that normal cats could potentially be shedding canine parvovirus and may be a potential source for dogs in the same environment. [MK]

See also: Battilani M, Balboni A, Ustulin M, et al. Genetic complexity and multiple infections with more Parvovirus species in naturally infected cats. Vet Res 2011;42:43. [free, full text article] 


More on cat health:
Winn Feline Foundation Library
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Read the Cat Health News Weekly
Join us on Google+
Clegg SR, Coyne KP, Dawson S, et al. Canine parvovirus in asymptomatic feline carriers. Vet Microbiol 2012;157:78-85.
 
Parvoviruses are important pathogens of dogs and cats, and have a high mutation rate. The canine strains that have emerged in recent years have the ability to infect and cause disease in cats as well as dogs. These investigators looked at the numbers of healthy cats in rescue shelters that harbor canine parvovirus in their feces. In fact, CPV was found in one-third of cats in a cat-only rescue shelter and a mixed rescue shelter. Interestingly, no feline parvovirus was found in these cats. Also interesting was the fact that none of the cats were clinically ill. This indicates that normal cats could potentially be shedding canine parvovirus and may be a potential source for dogs in the same environment. [MK]

See also: Battilani M, Balboni A, Ustulin M, et al. Genetic complexity and multiple infections with more Parvovirus species in naturally infected cats. Vet Res 2011;42:43. [free, full text article] 


More on cat health:
Winn Feline Foundation Library
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Read the Cat Health News Weekly
Join us on Google+
Read More


Cabinet for Health and Family Services held in contempt over Medicaid services for Eastern Kentuckians

Hazard Appalachian Regional Medical Center, one of
eight ARH hospitals. Courier-Journal photo, copyright 2000
For taking "practically no steps to a comply" to a request to help thousands of patients transfer their Medicaid services, the Cabinet for Health and Family Services was held in contempt of court Monday.

U.S. Senior Judge Karl Forester said the Cabinet's refused to "process requests by patients to transfer away from Coventry Cares, a managed-care organization, in light of Coventry's impending termination of its provider contract with Appalachian Regional Healthcare," reports Valarie Honeycutt Spears for the Lexington Herald-Leader.

ARH and Coventry, part of Coventry Health and Life Insurance Co., battled it out in court earlier this year when Coventry wanted to terminate its contract in May — six months before its contract was set to expire — with the hospital chain, which covers 25,000 patients. In turn, ARH filed a lawsuit asking for a preliminary injunction to avoid the termination, which was ultimately granted. The injunction states Coventry must continue to pay ARH for services until Nov. 1. But the cabinet was supposed to help facilitate the transfer of patients from Coventry to Wellcare, the only other company that has a contract with ARH, in the meantime. Forester said in his order about 6,000 transfer requests "were being held by the Cabinet," Spears reports.

Mike Wynn of The Courier-Journal reports that 8,400 patients have sought to switch to Wellcare from Coventry since May.

Though Forester said he will decide whether to impose sanctions on the cabinet at a later date, but did not require "the cabinet to process transfer requests with the start of open enrollment only five weeks away," Wynn reports. The open enrollment window is between Aug. 20 and Oct. 19, Spears reports.

Cabinet attorney argued processing transfers was unnecessary since Coventry had been forced to pay for services through the open enrollment period. ARH argued stopping the requests creates confusion.

In response to the ruling, the cabinet praised Forester for acknowledging "the need to allow the Medicaid program to proceed with open enrollment so as not to cause a gap in service or confusion for members."

"Member support is extremely important and the cabinet remains committed to listening to concerns from Medicaid members about their managed-care company as well as medical providers," the statement continued.
Hazard Appalachian Regional Medical Center, one of
eight ARH hospitals. Courier-Journal photo, copyright 2000
For taking "practically no steps to a comply" to a request to help thousands of patients transfer their Medicaid services, the Cabinet for Health and Family Services was held in contempt of court Monday.

U.S. Senior Judge Karl Forester said the Cabinet's refused to "process requests by patients to transfer away from Coventry Cares, a managed-care organization, in light of Coventry's impending termination of its provider contract with Appalachian Regional Healthcare," reports Valarie Honeycutt Spears for the Lexington Herald-Leader.

ARH and Coventry, part of Coventry Health and Life Insurance Co., battled it out in court earlier this year when Coventry wanted to terminate its contract in May — six months before its contract was set to expire — with the hospital chain, which covers 25,000 patients. In turn, ARH filed a lawsuit asking for a preliminary injunction to avoid the termination, which was ultimately granted. The injunction states Coventry must continue to pay ARH for services until Nov. 1. But the cabinet was supposed to help facilitate the transfer of patients from Coventry to Wellcare, the only other company that has a contract with ARH, in the meantime. Forester said in his order about 6,000 transfer requests "were being held by the Cabinet," Spears reports.

Mike Wynn of The Courier-Journal reports that 8,400 patients have sought to switch to Wellcare from Coventry since May.

Though Forester said he will decide whether to impose sanctions on the cabinet at a later date, but did not require "the cabinet to process transfer requests with the start of open enrollment only five weeks away," Wynn reports. The open enrollment window is between Aug. 20 and Oct. 19, Spears reports.

Cabinet attorney argued processing transfers was unnecessary since Coventry had been forced to pay for services through the open enrollment period. ARH argued stopping the requests creates confusion.

In response to the ruling, the cabinet praised Forester for acknowledging "the need to allow the Medicaid program to proceed with open enrollment so as not to cause a gap in service or confusion for members."

"Member support is extremely important and the cabinet remains committed to listening to concerns from Medicaid members about their managed-care company as well as medical providers," the statement continued.
Read More


Monday, July 16, 2012

Mothers should try to go to full term in their pregnancies, but many are unaware of the risks of early delivery, UK study finds

Illustration by Michelle Kumata via KRT
Babies who are born before the full term of 40 weeks may have health problems later in life, since important brain development takes place in the very last stages of pregnancy. As such, mothers should try to avoid being induced early or having elective C-sections.

A study conducted at the University of Kentucky College of Communication and Information found women often don't realize the important development that takes place at the end of pregnancy, write UK doctoral student Sarah Vos and H. Dan O'Hair, dean of the college, for the Lexington Herald-Leader.

Evidence shows that early, elective births are expensive. One study found reducing the number of elective births before 39 weeks of gestation to less than 2 percent of all U.S. births would save $1 billion each year.

But many women are uncomfortable at the end of their pregnancy, are anxious to know their children are healthy, and may even ask for early induction of labor because employers aren't flexible about time off. Sometimes doctors and other providers induce women early for their convenience.

Encouraging women to go full term and telling them the disadvantages of early labor — problems feeding and a higher incidence of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome — can influence their decision. As Vos and O'Hair conclude, "Babies are worth the wait." (Read more)
Illustration by Michelle Kumata via KRT
Babies who are born before the full term of 40 weeks may have health problems later in life, since important brain development takes place in the very last stages of pregnancy. As such, mothers should try to avoid being induced early or having elective C-sections.

A study conducted at the University of Kentucky College of Communication and Information found women often don't realize the important development that takes place at the end of pregnancy, write UK doctoral student Sarah Vos and H. Dan O'Hair, dean of the college, for the Lexington Herald-Leader.

Evidence shows that early, elective births are expensive. One study found reducing the number of elective births before 39 weeks of gestation to less than 2 percent of all U.S. births would save $1 billion each year.

But many women are uncomfortable at the end of their pregnancy, are anxious to know their children are healthy, and may even ask for early induction of labor because employers aren't flexible about time off. Sometimes doctors and other providers induce women early for their convenience.

Encouraging women to go full term and telling them the disadvantages of early labor — problems feeding and a higher incidence of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome — can influence their decision. As Vos and O'Hair conclude, "Babies are worth the wait." (Read more)
Read More


Book on Appalachian health gets good review from doctor

A new book discusses the health disparities that affect rural and urban Appalachians and has won the praise of a Kentucky physician, who calls its impact "profound."

Appalachian Health and Well-Being was reviewed by Dr. Kevin Kavanagh, a retired physician from Somerset, for The Courier-Journal.

Each chapter stands alone so readers can choose topics according to their interests. One chapter focuses on obesity and discusses issues like "food deserts" and lifestyle choices. The authors "suggest policy changes for childhood obesity of health school lunches, elimination of junk food and drinks from school vending machines, and an increase in physical activity," Kavanagh writes.

The book also sets the facts straight on myths such as the high incidence of consanguinity and the use of home remedies and faith-based healing in rural Appalachian communities. The authors find Appalachian communities are no different than other rural regions in these regards.

The book, edited by University of Cincinnati scholars Robert L. Ludke and Phillip J. Obermiller, also discusses the methamphetamine epidemic. It notes that in Eastern Kentucky 377 meth labs were found in 2005, while in 2011, nearly 200 labs were found just in Laurel County alone. "For those who wish to understand the health and well-being in Eastern Kentucky, this is an insightful book which will give us all an appreciation of the herculean task that has been placed upon the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services," Kavanagh concludes. (Read more)
A new book discusses the health disparities that affect rural and urban Appalachians and has won the praise of a Kentucky physician, who calls its impact "profound."

Appalachian Health and Well-Being was reviewed by Dr. Kevin Kavanagh, a retired physician from Somerset, for The Courier-Journal.

Each chapter stands alone so readers can choose topics according to their interests. One chapter focuses on obesity and discusses issues like "food deserts" and lifestyle choices. The authors "suggest policy changes for childhood obesity of health school lunches, elimination of junk food and drinks from school vending machines, and an increase in physical activity," Kavanagh writes.

The book also sets the facts straight on myths such as the high incidence of consanguinity and the use of home remedies and faith-based healing in rural Appalachian communities. The authors find Appalachian communities are no different than other rural regions in these regards.

The book, edited by University of Cincinnati scholars Robert L. Ludke and Phillip J. Obermiller, also discusses the methamphetamine epidemic. It notes that in Eastern Kentucky 377 meth labs were found in 2005, while in 2011, nearly 200 labs were found just in Laurel County alone. "For those who wish to understand the health and well-being in Eastern Kentucky, this is an insightful book which will give us all an appreciation of the herculean task that has been placed upon the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services," Kavanagh concludes. (Read more)
Read More


Biggest problem with health-care reform law is advocates' poor sales job to the American public, Rep. John Yarmuth tells C-J


By Tara Kaprowy
Kentucky Health News

The biggest problem with the federal health-care reform law is not the law itself, but the fact that "We've never done as good a job as we could have" in explaining what it is about, Democratic U.S. Rep. John Yarmuth of Louisville told the editorial board of The Courier-Journal Friday.

In his lengthy interview, Yarmuth said the problem started at the law's inception when President Obama outlined his parameters but  let Congress decide what the bill should be. "The challenge was explaining what the bill even was because we didn't know what it was going to be," he said.

The issue was compounded by the fact that, unlike energy legislation where its "impact is relatively uniform," with health care "everyone wants to know how it will affect you and your family ... and it's all different," Yarmuth said. "It's hard to market something individually to 300 million people."

Also contributing to the problem is the complexity of the subject itself, which Yarmuth likened to "the biggest Rubik's cube that ever existed," since "Every time you move one piece, 100 pieces move."

That has resulted in deeply-seated misconceptions about the law that are difficult to undo. The biggest, he said, is "that it is some form of government takeover." Those with that view note that the law's individual mandate in the law will force people to buy insurance or pay a fine, and the law will impose new rules on health-insurance companies and put many other controls on the system.

But Yarmuth argues the law uses "free enterprise and competition" to "provide more affordable care for individuals." Indeed, state insurance exchanges will feature different benefits packages from private companies from which people who qualify for the exchange can choose. People who qualify for the exchange — those who earn up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level — will be given subsidies in the form of tax breaks to help pay for their premiums. "The reason why the Republicans don't have an alternative is Obamacare was their alternative," Yarmuth said. "This was their plan: creating competition among insurers and letting them compete for individual business."

Another misconception is that people who don't have health insurance are "deadbeats," Yarmuth said. But he said 37 percent of Americans who are uninsured make over $50,000 a year and almost 20 percent make over $75,000 a year (those percentages are confirmed here). "No, these are solid citizens," he said. He pointed out that all families pay the cost of those who are uninsured, adding that an estimated $1,000 of every health insurance policy goes toward paying for uncompensated care.

Yarmuth said in Kentucky nearly $600 million is spent on uncompensated care each year. (A Kentucky Hospital Association report estimated it is far higher: $1.67 billion in 2010.) Regardless of the figure, Yarmuth said losses could be offset by expanding Medicaid, a claim supported by a report by the Urban Institute. Expansion would cover almost 300,000 Kentuckians and would cost the state $515 million through 2019, he said. "It will bring in $12 billion of federal money," he said. "Is that a good trade-off?"

Asked how provisions in the law would be paid for, Yarmuth acknowledged "If you're adding 30 million more people, it's going to add cost to the system." Ultimately, costs will continue to go up but "less than they otherwise would," he said. He referred to pre-law estimates by the Congressional Budget Office that the cost of employer-based insurance would double to $25,000 a year for a family of four, but the law seems to have slowed that trend. Yarmuth referred to an article published in the journal Health Affairs that indicated that between 2010 and 2011, overall national health-care expenditures increased by 3.9 percent. "That's the lowest rate of growth in the last 50 years," he said. "It is having an effect." The CBO estimated the law will reduce the deficit over the next 10 years by $130 billion, with an estimated $1.2 trillion saved in the second 10, Yarmuth noted. "We all knew we were on an unsustainable path."

But most still don't know that, and on Saturday, a day after the Yarmuth interview, the C-J editorial board criticized Democrats for not doing a better job getting their message out about the new law: "The problem is partially that the law is complex and 2,000 pages long. It's partially that the Republicans have successfully put the Democrats on the defensive, forcing them to defend the law to people who have already had the GOP message driving into their heads. But it's also that the Democrats don't trust that the American people will be willing or able to understand them when they defend the health-care law."

By Tara Kaprowy
Kentucky Health News

The biggest problem with the federal health-care reform law is not the law itself, but the fact that "We've never done as good a job as we could have" in explaining what it is about, Democratic U.S. Rep. John Yarmuth of Louisville told the editorial board of The Courier-Journal Friday.

In his lengthy interview, Yarmuth said the problem started at the law's inception when President Obama outlined his parameters but  let Congress decide what the bill should be. "The challenge was explaining what the bill even was because we didn't know what it was going to be," he said.

The issue was compounded by the fact that, unlike energy legislation where its "impact is relatively uniform," with health care "everyone wants to know how it will affect you and your family ... and it's all different," Yarmuth said. "It's hard to market something individually to 300 million people."

Also contributing to the problem is the complexity of the subject itself, which Yarmuth likened to "the biggest Rubik's cube that ever existed," since "Every time you move one piece, 100 pieces move."

That has resulted in deeply-seated misconceptions about the law that are difficult to undo. The biggest, he said, is "that it is some form of government takeover." Those with that view note that the law's individual mandate in the law will force people to buy insurance or pay a fine, and the law will impose new rules on health-insurance companies and put many other controls on the system.

But Yarmuth argues the law uses "free enterprise and competition" to "provide more affordable care for individuals." Indeed, state insurance exchanges will feature different benefits packages from private companies from which people who qualify for the exchange can choose. People who qualify for the exchange — those who earn up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level — will be given subsidies in the form of tax breaks to help pay for their premiums. "The reason why the Republicans don't have an alternative is Obamacare was their alternative," Yarmuth said. "This was their plan: creating competition among insurers and letting them compete for individual business."

Another misconception is that people who don't have health insurance are "deadbeats," Yarmuth said. But he said 37 percent of Americans who are uninsured make over $50,000 a year and almost 20 percent make over $75,000 a year (those percentages are confirmed here). "No, these are solid citizens," he said. He pointed out that all families pay the cost of those who are uninsured, adding that an estimated $1,000 of every health insurance policy goes toward paying for uncompensated care.

Yarmuth said in Kentucky nearly $600 million is spent on uncompensated care each year. (A Kentucky Hospital Association report estimated it is far higher: $1.67 billion in 2010.) Regardless of the figure, Yarmuth said losses could be offset by expanding Medicaid, a claim supported by a report by the Urban Institute. Expansion would cover almost 300,000 Kentuckians and would cost the state $515 million through 2019, he said. "It will bring in $12 billion of federal money," he said. "Is that a good trade-off?"

Asked how provisions in the law would be paid for, Yarmuth acknowledged "If you're adding 30 million more people, it's going to add cost to the system." Ultimately, costs will continue to go up but "less than they otherwise would," he said. He referred to pre-law estimates by the Congressional Budget Office that the cost of employer-based insurance would double to $25,000 a year for a family of four, but the law seems to have slowed that trend. Yarmuth referred to an article published in the journal Health Affairs that indicated that between 2010 and 2011, overall national health-care expenditures increased by 3.9 percent. "That's the lowest rate of growth in the last 50 years," he said. "It is having an effect." The CBO estimated the law will reduce the deficit over the next 10 years by $130 billion, with an estimated $1.2 trillion saved in the second 10, Yarmuth noted. "We all knew we were on an unsustainable path."

But most still don't know that, and on Saturday, a day after the Yarmuth interview, the C-J editorial board criticized Democrats for not doing a better job getting their message out about the new law: "The problem is partially that the law is complex and 2,000 pages long. It's partially that the Republicans have successfully put the Democrats on the defensive, forcing them to defend the law to people who have already had the GOP message driving into their heads. But it's also that the Democrats don't trust that the American people will be willing or able to understand them when they defend the health-care law."
Read More